(Today is the anniversary of the 1978 assassinations of San Francisco Mayor George Moscone and Supervisor Harvey Milk at the hands of fellow Supervisor Dan White. It happened nine days after the Jonestown massacre and the assassination of Leo Ryan, a Bay Area Congressional Representative. Jim Jones himself was well connected in the San Francisco political scene. At the time, I was working in Davis, east of San Francisco near Sacramento. I remember clearly Dianne Feinstein’s announcement of the assassinations as she became Mayor of the city.)
In my ongoing research on the arrangement of names on memorials, I am reading an excellent book by James E. Young, The Texture of Memory: Holocaust Memorials and Meaning. It won the Jewish Book Council’s National Book Award in the Holocaust category. I highly recommend this to anyone interested in the nature of monuments and memorials.
On
p. 54, Young shows a photo and describes a memorial at the Wittenbergplatz
transit station in Berlin. A simple sign
listing the names of ten concentration camps, it begins with the phrase “Places
of terror that we should never forget.”
Young writes that the camps “are in no special order, other than that
the German camps are listed last.”
As an arrangement expert, I realized listing the German camps last indicates someone thought about the order of the names. People who like to organize tend to take another step, if only for their own benefit. So I used Wikipedia to find a pattern, building a spreadsheet of categories that might be organizing criteria, including locations, dates of operation, numbers of prisoners, and numbers of deaths. I discovered the camps are listed in a complex order that adds meaning to our understanding of the memorial and of the Holocaust.
Camp |
|
Established |
Number of Prisoners |
Deaths |
Auschwitz |
Poland |
1940 |
400,000 |
1,100,000 |
Stutthof |
Poland |
1939 |
110,000 |
65,000 |
Maidanek |
Poland |
1941 |
Extermination camp |
78,000 |
Treblinka |
Poland |
1942 |
Extermination camp |
870,000 |
Theresienstadt |
Czechoslovakia |
1941 |
140,000 |
35,000 |
Buchenwald |
Germany |
1937 |
250,000 |
56,000 |
Dachau |
Germany |
1933 |
200,000 |
31,591 |
Sachsenhausen |
Germany |
1936 |
100,000 |
200,000 |
Ravensbruck |
Germany |
1939 |
150,000 |
90,000 |
Bergen-Belsen |
Germany |
1943 |
70,000 |
100,000 |
(Data from Wikipedia’s List of Nazi-German Concentration Camps. The number of deaths at Bergen-Belsen is not included in the Wikipedia table, but is estimated from the first paragraph in the Wikipedia article on Bergen-Belsen.)
The first four camps in the arrangement are located in
Poland. The fifth, Theresienstadt, is in
Czechoslovakia, with the rest in Germany.
In Poland and in Germany, the first camp is the largest. The remaining camps in the two countries are
then listed by the date the camp was established.
There may be several reasons for placing Poland first and Germany last. Auschwitz is by far the largest camp, with the largest number of deaths, so placing it first in the full list is appropriate. In addition, Germany is the host of the sign and perpetrator of the Holocaust, so the sign designers placed themselves last. Therefore Theresienstadt, the sole Czech camp, is in the middle.
Why did the designers combine size and date as an arrangement? If they wanted the largest camp first, why
not list the rest in order by size? I
believe they wanted to avoid a hierarchy of horror. Treblinka, which only had enough space to
kill people, was not more benign because it was smaller. Another option that would place Auschwitz
first is alphabetical order. But alphabetical
order has no meaning. Auschwitz is not
first because it starts with an A. It is
first because it is the largest place of terror.
This arrangement is so complex, with three different placement strategies, that an honored Holocaust scholar did not see it. What is the purpose of something so obscure? Should the designers put a paragraph on the back of the sign explaining their intentions?
Memorials, even simple signs, are a form of art. We don’t usually explain art on the piece
itself. We let viewers discover their
own understanding. Like most artists,
the sign designers offered clues. They
placed Auschwitz, which begins with an A, first in a non-alphabetic
arrangement. They also set apart the
three countries. This sign is intended
for Germans who would know the five camps in their own country. The clues tell us there is some sort of
arrangement here. Young recognized this
when he commented that the German camps were last.
The Wittenbergplatz sign is at a transit station in a busy Berlin shopping area. There may be thousands of commuters who see it every day. If the sign were in alphabetical order, it would be stagnant. Instead it has a structure that is implied but not obvious, an enigma perhaps adding more conscious thought to those thousands who every day see the words, “Places of terror that we should never forget.”
Comments